X
HGG Community Forums
Log In to HorseGeneticsGame
HGG Community Forums
Join our discord server!
Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Categories
- All Discussions68,241
- Announcements356
- HJ2 Discussion67,060
- ↳ New Member Introductions569
- ↳ Help me out3,469
- ↳ Horses For Sale and Auction12,515
- ↳ Breeding Ads and Sales3,456
- ↳ Herd Helper39,570
- ↳ Bug Discussion120
- ↳ Repair Log12
- General Discussion825
- ↳ Saddle Sisterhood32
- ↳ Games, Contests and GiveAWays54
- ↳ Genetics245
Who's Online (0)
Appaloosa Question
-
This filly appears to be Leopard, but she has patn+ and patn1 , so she would not be considered a leopard ?
wild 3405878baystyapp2gID #21047 -
Genetically speaking, not technically a leopard, but visually (phenotypically) speaking, I'd call her a leopard if I saw her in a field. :P
Ammit has mentioned before that PATN1 isn't the only indicator of blanket size - there's another hidden gene that affects it too. Same goes for spots size, actually - number of darkening genes affects it, but there's a hidden gene affecting it as well.ISO any and all Silver Pocket Watches!
God grant me the hbs to buy the ponies I need,
The fortitude to resist the shiny ones I truly don't,
And the wisdom to know there will always be more next time.Thanked by 1supersarah -
She looks more like what one would call a near leopard. She still has just a bit of color left on her legs - so, though she looks close to leopard, she is blanketed. She just has a really big blanket!
She's similar to this guy - who is also PATN1 / PATN+ and has a very large blanket. But, he still has some solid color left on the legs, like your girl does.
3327353
This girl is a complete leopard (PATN1 / PATN1) and you can see her legs are solid white with the spots.
3327360Thanked by 1supersarah